South Cambridgeshire
Archaeology and Planning Conditions in South Cambridgeshire
South Cambridgeshire carries much of the county's strategic housing and employment growth, and much of it sits on landscapes with a high likelihood of buried archaeology.
- Stage one
- Desk-based assessment and, where required, geophysical survey
- Stage two
- Trial trench evaluation to characterise and quantify
- Stage three
- Mitigation — targeted excavation, strip map and sample, or watching brief
- Stage four
- Reporting, archive, publication where committed
Where the archaeological advice comes from
Applications here are handled through the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning service, with archaeological advice supplied at county level. The practical consequence for a developer is that the archaeological requirement is usually set by landscape character and Historic Environment Record data rather than by anything visible on the site itself.
How conditions are typically worded here
Expect staged conditions on larger sites: evaluation to inform a mitigation strategy, then a mitigation scheme approved in writing, then reporting and archive. On phased schemes the condition is often written so that each phase must be discharged before that phase begins, which can be an advantage if the phasing is planned around it.
What the authority expects to see
A written scheme that omits any of the following is likely to come back, and a rejection costs weeks at the point in the programme least able to absorb them.
Continue
Sources and further reading
We use current public policy and guidance to keep this practical explanation grounded. Sources checked 19 September 2026.
- Greater Cambridge planning ↗
Greater Cambridge Shared Planning
- Archaeological advice for planning developments ↗
Cambridgeshire County Council
- Cambridgeshire Historic Environment Record ↗
Cambridgeshire County Council
- National Planning Policy Framework ↗
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
- Historic environment: planning practice guidance ↗
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Questions
Common questions on this
Does phasing the development reduce archaeological cost?
It rarely reduces the total, but it can transform cash flow and programme risk by aligning each archaeological phase with the construction phase that needs it, rather than paying for the whole site up front.
We already have a geophysical survey. Is that enough?
Usually not on its own. Geophysics indicates where anomalies are; it does not tell the authority what they are or how well preserved they are. Evaluation normally still follows, but a good survey makes the evaluation smaller and better targeted.
Project review
Discharging an archaeological condition in South Cambridgeshire?
Send us the condition wording, the site plan and any existing survey data. We will tell you what the requirement is and what it means for your programme.