Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Archaeology and Development at Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Laboratory and clinical development in south Cambridge combines deep foundations, tight sites and fixed occupation dates — a combination that makes archaeological programme risk unusually expensive.
- Authority
- Greater Cambridge Shared Planning
- Landscape
- Gravel terrace and chalk, south Cambridge
- Cost driver
- Depth and completeness of ground disturbance
- Biggest risk
- Fixed occupation dates with no archaeological float
The landscape
Southern fringe of Cambridge on gravel terrace and chalk, an area with recognised multi-period activity. Development here typically involves deep basements, extensive services and piling, meaning ground disturbance is both deep and near total across the footprint.
What it means for your development
Where ground disturbance is total, there is little scope to preserve archaeology in place, so mitigation usually means full excavation of the affected footprint. The commercial consequence is that the archaeological programme has to be resolved before the construction programme is committed, not alongside it.
Questions
Common questions on this
Can foundation design reduce archaeological cost?
Sometimes materially. Where a design can reduce the depth or extent of disturbance, preservation in place becomes arguable and excavation scope falls. That conversation has to happen at design stage, not after approval.
Project review
Developing at Cambridge Biomedical Campus?
Send the planning position and the site plan. We will set out the likely archaeological requirement, the sequence and where the programme risk sits.